Performance and latency testing providers
23 published entries state performance and latency testing on their AI testing pages. Between them they name 8 AI product types.
Load and latency testing of inference: throughput, time to first token and cost per request. Quality checks under load may use LLM-as-judge.
LLM-as-judge: Using one language model to grade another model's answers against a rubric.Showing 23 of 23. Default order: coverage score, then name. How the score works.
| Rank | Company type | AI products (as stated) | Services | Verified | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DeviQA | Pure-play QA company | Poland, Warsaw | LLM applicationsAI agentsRecommender and ranking systemsPredictive ML modelsComputer visionVoice AI | 8 | 2010 | 16 | 2026-11-09 | |
| 2 | Abstracta | Pure-play QA company | United States, Jacksonville | LLM applicationsAI agentsPredictive ML models | 10 | 2008 | 15 | 2026-11-09 | |
| 4 | BetterQA | Pure-play QA company | Romania, Cluj-Napoca | LLM applicationsAI agentsVoice AI | 9 | 2018 | 14 | 2026-11-09 | |
| 4 | QATestLab | Pure-play QA company | Cyprus | LLM applicationsAI agentsPredictive ML models | 10 | 14 | 2026-11-09 | ||
| 4 | TestDevLab | Pure-play QA company | Latvia, Riga | LLM applicationsAI agentsVoice AIComputer visionPredictive ML modelsRecommender and ranking systemsAutonomous and embedded AI | 5 | 2011 | 14 | 2026-11-09 | |
| 11 | Fulminous Software | IT services firm with a QA practice | India, Jaipur | Voice AIAI agentsAutonomous and embedded AI | 7 | 2019 | 12 | 2026-11-09 | |
| 11 | QualityAI (formerly Qualitest) | Pure-play QA company | United States, Santa Clara | LLM applicationsAI agentsPredictive ML modelsRecommender and ranking systems | 7 | 12 | 2026-11-09 | ||
| 11 | SunTec India | Data and evaluation vendor | India, New Delhi | LLM applicationsDocument AIPredictive ML models | 7 | 1999 | 12 | 2026-11-09 | |
| 14 | QA Madness | Pure-play QA company | Poland, Warsaw | LLM applicationsAI agentsRecommender and ranking systems | 7 | 11 | 2026-11-09 | ||
| 14 | QAwerk | Pure-play QA company | Ukraine, Kyiv | LLM applicationsAI agents | 7 | 2015 | 11 | 2026-11-09 | |
| 14 | Testrig Technologies | Pure-play QA company | United States, Dallas | Predictive ML models | 8 | 2015 | 11 | 2026-11-09 | |
| 18 | Indium Software | IT services firm with a QA practice | United States, Cupertino | AI agentsLLM applicationsRecommender and ranking systems | 6 | 10 | 2026-11-09 | ||
| 18 | KiwiQA | Pure-play QA company | Australia, Bella Vista | LLM applications | 7 | 2009 | 10 | 2026-11-09 | |
| 18 | Kualitatem | Pure-play QA company | United States, New York | Predictive ML models | 7 | 2010 | 10 | 2026-11-09 | |
| 23 | BugRaptors | Pure-play QA company | India | Computer visionPredictive ML modelsVoice AI | 4 | 2016 | 9 | 2026-11-09 | |
| 23 | Chetu | IT services firm with a QA practice | United States, Sunrise | Predictive ML models | 6 | 2000 | 9 | 2026-11-09 | |
| 23 | Codoid | Pure-play QA company | India, Chennai | LLM applicationsAI agents | 5 | 2012 | 9 | 2026-11-09 | |
| 23 | Luxe Quality | Pure-play QA company | United States, McLean | Computer visionVoice AIPredictive ML models | 5 | 9 | 2026-11-09 | ||
| 29 | Frugal Testing | Pure-play QA company | India, Hyderabad | Voice AIComputer visionAutonomous and embedded AI | 4 | 8 | 2026-11-09 | ||
| 29 | TestMatick | Pure-play QA company | United States, New York | Recommender and ranking systemsPredictive ML models | 4 | 2009 | 8 | 2026-11-09 | |
| 34 | MosChip | IT services firm with a QA practice | India, Hyderabad | AI agentsAutonomous and embedded AI | 3 | 1999 | 7 | 2026-11-09 | |
| 34 | Qualitrix | Pure-play QA company | India, Bengaluru | Predictive ML models | 5 | 7 | 2026-11-09 | ||
| 61 | Snoopgame | Pure-play QA company | Estonia, Tallinn | Computer visionRecommender and ranking systems | 2 | 4 | 2026-11-09 |
Product types covered by vendors stating this service
Count of entries on this page that state each product type.
| Product type | Performance and latency testing |
|---|---|
| LLM applications | 12 |
| AI agents | 12 |
| Voice AI | 7 |
| Computer vision | 6 |
| Predictive ML models | 13 |
| Recommender and ranking systems | 7 |
| Generative media | 0 |
| Document AI | 1 |
| Autonomous and embedded AI | 4 |
Scope and standards referenced
Inference load, token throughput, time to first token, cost per request under load.
The directory lists which vendors state this service. It does not test whether a vendor applies these standards.
Related
Product types
Other services
Questions
Which metrics are used to evaluate voice agent quality?
Common metrics are word error rate for recognition, intent accuracy, task completion, response latency, interruption handling and listener ratings of synthesised speech.